Russell Sherwood Wednesday, August 22, 2018
On the final day of the ICCF meetings, the review of proposals continued with Rules, Tournament Directors Committee, Appeals Committees, Arbitration Committee, Zonal Reports, Internal matters, Committee Membership and Future Congress venue
An interesting debate ensued over the next set proposals based on the strength of the event compared with the nature of a closed age based event generating qualification to an open event.
Rejected 17-20 with 20 abstentions
Rejected 16-22 with 19 abstentions
Rejected 17-21 with 19 abstentions
Rejected 17-22 with 18 abstentions
Passed 29-5 with 23 abstentions, based on the idea 960 is not comparable with classical chess,
Passed 29-4 with 24 abstentions. This proposal is related to the allowing of Title Norm events in the Finals of certain events where normal criteria are not met,
Passed 28-5 with 24 abstentions. This debate was about the poor postal service in some countries and its effects on postal play
Passed 34-3 with 20 abstentions. A typo correction.
Rejected 8-24 with 25 abstentions.
Rejected 12-23 with 22 abstentions.
Passed 38-1 with 19 abstentions.
Passed 36-3 with 18 abstentions
Passed 37-2 with 18 abstentions
Rejected 7-28 with 22 abstentions
Rejected 3-33 with 21 abstentions
Withdrawn
Passed 36-5 with 16 abstentions
Passed 20-19 with 18 abstentions
Rejected 18-21 with 18 abstentions
Passed 30-9 with 18 abstentions
Passed 37-2 with 18 abstentions
Passed 34-4 with 19 abstentions
Passed 37-3 with 17 abstentions
Withdrawn
Withdrawn
Passed Unanimously!
